good or bad
- it cleared all my doubts about atom bombs.now i can make up or understand easily what principle do atom bombs use
- —Guest prakhar rathor
They are good.
- I know that nuclear weapons were used in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. But what if something happens from space or what ever and nothing we have could destroy it but nukes. The only problem is if a terrorist gets them use them right they wont cause harm mankind may have made destuctive weapon but doesnt mean we made it out of rage. You guys sound stupid saying things about mankind they way you did you and myself we are Human and cant change that. Mankind hopefully wont destroy itself but nuclear weapons will one day be used into battle I am sure of that.
- —Guest Nigel
nukes
- they saved alot of lives during world war II. without them the war would have continued on for many more months perhaps years and with alot more blood shed on both sides.........
- —Guest gary
Make Love Not Bombs:D
- I feel that enough people die on a daily basis with out killing millions of people. The pearl harbor thing was bad dont get me wrong but Killing helpless people just for payback seems wrong in my book. Men, women, and children died. People just like us. They supported there country just like we do or they hated it just like some of us feel. Either way they are people and imagine if millions of people in the U.S were killed then it would seem like so much more. Just because there from Japan does not make blowing up peoples homes and families and messing up future generations right.I think that nuclear bombs are a poor choice of war supplies, without them things would be less violent. In no way are they good, that would be like saying its good to watch milliions of people die.I dont know about you but thats wrong in my book.
- —Guest Shannon
Who is the target
- If USA is such a goody-goody, and the saviour of mankind, why should it always consider itself needing nuclear deterrent protection, and against whom? Wo are rogues, them or others?
- —Guest Lol
theorist
- not good,but most likely a necessary evil to keep the worlds psychos at bay
- —Guest brad
nuclear weapons
- we should ask this question from a children in hiroshima.
- —Guest iranian boy
nuke, good, human bad...
- the U.S. would have lost up to and over 1,000,000 soldiers over a war they didnt start, better a few Japs than that many soldiers. war is hell havent you heard.
- —Guest hairball
Nukes is bad
- we all know that Japanese attack pearl harbor and kill many American but killing japanese civilians is not the way they can repay their lives nuclear bomb will make our world more poisonous and will made many disaster in our world
- —Guest cleopatriz
Nuclear Power
- Pearl Harbour, that was fucked. Japanese soldiers torturing allied soldiers, that was fucked. The fact is these things happen in war. But there is a significant difference between killing soldiers, and killing civilians. Those bombs killed hundreds of thousands of not just men, but women and children. Not only that but the radiation poising fucked up future generations and turned their country into a wasteland. It wasn't payback for pearl, it was at least 5 times that, dont ever say they can even be close to equal, they cant. Human stupidity, combined with nuclear weapons will destroy our race.
- —Guest Jesus
Great Pictures of Great Disaster
- Men have filled the rage wihin and expressed in full vigour even to make it a massive ruin with after effects!
- —Guest george m
Say "No To Nukes"
- In the year 2525 is Man is still alive it will be because we will have said "No to Nukes." If, instead we say "Yes to Nukes" then only GOD will be alive in 2525.
- —guhor1
Fairy good
- It is good we have dat kind of weapon around us for a profitic purpose & not for babaric uses
- —Guest Beast
Fairy good
- It is good we have dat kind of weapon around us for a profitic purpose & not for babaric uses
- —Guest Beast
beat me
- the use of nuke or associated projects should be put to stop. to have a saver world.
- —Guest felix
